I have been calling this "my light".
I like light. It matters most, for a photographer, to have some!
I enjoy "created light", as in a studio. I have worked often in full sun, the severity and harshness of which (except during the Golden Hour) require some forceful, if nuanced, taming. I really like fog. Overcast light presents its own challenges, but can work very well when large swaths of sky do not intrude.
But if, in some hypothetical scenario, I had to choose only one light to work with, to the exclusion of all others, then I would brook no doubt; I opt for dawn, by which in my case I mean specifically the hour before sunrise.
My last blog, on Sunrises, mentioned that five minutes after the sun comes up, I may—not every time—simply put my camera gear away.
Post-sunset light behaves similarly, but pre-sunrise light, with its quiet world, simply suits me.
We have a variety of dawn lights to work with, usually involving shades of red (nearer the sun) or blue, hardly ever green.
Let me mention, for any interested photographers, about the exposure. In order to reproduce the actual darkness of a pre-sunrise light, I often darken the in-the-camera exposure, using an exposure value ("EV") of -1 or even less. But, by adjusting the shutter speed, we can quite easily make it look as bright or as dark as we want, and I know of no art-rule mandating fidelity. I often liked it dark, through the lens, and so produce it dark. Exposures closer to neutral will often offer, I believe, easier editing, from where one can darken them (or lighten them) to taste. So I will often use that EV of -1, even if I wish to darken it further later.
Using mid-apertures and an ISO of 200, I find that the exposures shorten from about 30 seconds, let's say 45 minutes prior to sunrise, to values of around 1/30 second, just before sunrise. (So, this pretty well always requires a sturdy tripod.)
You'll notice in the previous blog a sister-image to the one above, made a few minutes later as the sun poked out. (Don't worry: I was dressed for the conditions, and nowhere near wilderness.)
A word about white-balance ("WB"). In clear skies, prior to sunrise, should one set the WB to "sun", or "shade"? (I don't use "Auto" for my serious work, especially if I might want a series to all have the same mood.) In cloudy skies: set the WB to "shade", or "cloud"?
Well, you can sort all of this out later in the digital darkroom, especially if working from "raw" files (but JPEGs can do), but I find myself very often returning (even if cloud covers three-quarters of the sky) to the "sun" setting. It will give you that intense blue in the sky, at a time when the near-darkness still looks close to black to the eye—or at least to my eye—but we humans cannot view it like a camera, with a 30-second exposure; the eye/brain sight apparatus simply doesn't work that way. As far as I can determine, blue represents the true colour, but really: who cares? I have looked at it with the colour-temperature adjusted all up and down the scale, and often—not always—revert to "sun" and let it go blue.
And you will hear about the "Blue Hour" (less often than the Golden Hour), which means that the general photographic community seems to feel similarly.
However, the red/orange above—starting with the WB set to "sun"—indicates that the sun will rise nearby soon (and I love the look), but what to do when cloud or fog obscure the sun completely?
With heavy cloud-cover (confession time) I often choose the option of staying home, but ... I will hoist my weary carcass out of bed for fog.
Anyway, let's say that we have chosen to work under cloudy skies; then we're going to experiment, and I sometimes do better by using the "Shade" (not "Cloud") setting. Know your camera. Use your eye. Decide whether you wish to represent the scene accurately, or to take artistic license. (If in doubt, I favour taking license!) In the following, I thought it worked best by abandoning colour completely.
And then, how much do I allow myself to manipulate the colour later, in editing? I allow myself to do whatever I like, thank you very much, and so far the Photographic Purity Association has not caught up with me. Often, I use editing to restore fidelity to a photograph, which sounds counter-intuitive, but it often works out like that. However, if I want to change the colours (which I usually do not), or saturate them more intensely (which I usually do), then I do.
(To the few paleo-art-critics: live with it.)
I find, in my files, 345 labelled with "dawn". Here I have shown eight recent examples, which cannot possibly illustrate all of the moods of dawn (many still waiting for me to discover), but which I hope have given an enjoyable overview.
Not that "serene" and "calm" always describe dawn. Another future topic could be "violent dawns" - they happen too, and often provide wonderful photographic opportunities.
Charles T. Low